We know Confirmit has the option to trigger a second question (or more) based on a previous question answer, you may find this called dynamic questions. Unsure which solution is best for your company? See our detailed comparison of confirmit & fluid-review. Compare Fluid Review vs. Manual Email. Surely by now, if you were in Confirmit world long enough, you must have heard questions about closing studies automatically when a quota is reached. Bank Of America there. Xf Keygen Machine. Read 20 Confirmit Horizons reviews. Learn the pros/cons, pricing, integrations and feature ratings before you buy.

Compare Fluid Review vs. Confirmit Finding the most effective CRM Software product is all about assessing different solutions and determining the top program for your specific needs. Our unique algorythm provides you with a quick look at the general rating of Confirmit and Fluid Review. For all round quality and performance, Confirmit scored 8.8, while Fluid Review scored 9.3. Mac Os X Lion Iso Torrent Español more.

On the other hand, for user satisfaction, Confirmit earned 94%, while Fluid Review earned 96%. Below it's also possible to check their features, terms, plans, etc. To find out which software will be more suitable for your company. An important element to evaluate is if the application lets you to enable/disable restrictions on various types of users to limit the exposure of any critical business data. Currently, the top products in our Survey Software category are: SurveyGizmo, SurveyMonkey, QuestionPro.

When I started working for this company back in 2003 we used to upgrade our production servers pretty regularly every six months. A couple of times we decided to go nine or twelve months between upgrades, and in one very particular instance when we had to replace a core data storage system we went a whopping twenty months between releases. Today we release to production four times per week (Monday through Thursday). So, what happened? And perhaps as important – why? Author Posted on Categories, Tags.

Background About 3-years ago, we started our move from deployment using MSI to using. The MSI setup was hard to maintain and manual to deploy/install.

Octopus seemed like a good fit for automated deployments. For more than 1 1/2 years, we have now been running all our deployments to both test and production environments using Octopus. Confirmit Horizons is a quite large application/platform that consists of 60+ services, API’s and web applications. The deployment process in Octopus has about 80 steps. At the same time we have also stared our journey from a monolith to microservices so the number of services and API’s are constantly growing. On our main Octopus server, we have about 40 environments.

Most are test and staging environments. Our three On-Demand environments in US, UK and Australia are also defined on this server. There are a total of about 300 machines/tentacles in these environments. We also have an Octopus test server mainly used for development/testing of microservices.

It has about 60 projects, 10 environments and 50 machines/tentacles. So far, all is standard usage of Octopus. Challenges We have a set of challenges that are not solved by standard usage of Octopus. Author Posted on Categories Tags,,, Search for: Search About Confirmit.